quote:Originally posted by mr chips
First of all, this site is about aesthetics(Good food vs. Bad food) and some of our worst fights seem to be about definitions.
You're making the same mistake as Steve - my ire is not due to the definition of fast food, but the fact that he - one of those whose incessant whining got the FFF forum created so that he and the others in his tolerance-challenged clique wouldn't even have to see the listing of FFF topics - is now here, spending time reading and posting in this vey same "leper colony" of a forum - that's the problem.
One might hope that someone who claimed never to even want to view FFF topics again would at least have the good common sense to stay away. But here he is, bothering those of us who have some sense and/or tolerance (albeit not for those whiners) with his inane crap.
quote:Originally posted by mr chips
How many locations before something is a chain?
Irrelevant. Pioneer Chicken is a dying chain with only a few locations left in Southen California, and is not a fast food joint to boot. Yet a thead on Pioneer Chicken was moved here.
quote:Originally posted by mr chips
Is it possible for fast food to be "good" roadfood? Aesthtics is not scientific and it relies on individual judgement and will always be imprecise. Places such an IN N OUT, Burgerville,Gold Star, Lou Meriani's(sic) are regional in nature but have passionate defenders and I think are genuine Roadfood places..
Rubio's, Pizzeria Uno, Nathan's are regionals that may have crossed to the "dark side" and McDonald"s and Burger King are definitely part of the evil empire and anti-roadfood.
Then explain to me why a thread on the much-beloved institution In and Out has been moved to this forum?
quote:Originally posted by mr chips
Too much has been made of the relegation of fast food topics to a forum that doen not appear on the opening page. The OWNERS of this WEB site want the change and it is THEIR site so the rest of us should just accept it. We still can talk about the franchises as much as we want.
I disagree. There was a period in time when the owners of this site specifically permitted (I have the quote, as Steve pointed out) the inclusion of topics now banished to the FFF forum in the othe forums. During that period of time, Steve and others like him actively opposed the inclusion of such threads and railed against posters who dared to speak of fast food or franchise topics. They actively insulted and denigrated such posters, and generally ranted to anyone who would listen that such discussion should not be permitted here. Well, at this time, they have to an extent achieved their goal. Management of this site has changed it's philosophy. But all that means to me is that management is no longer on my side. I have opposed this change and will continue to do so.
quote:Originally posted by mr chips
Let the admins do their thing. If a subject is in the wrong place, it can be moved.
Part of the problem is that the new pilosophy is so ill-defined that threads are being moved that should not be moved at all. The Pioneer Cicken, In and Out, and Waffle House are good examples of this.
quote:Originally posted by mr chips
Just as I grew weary of anti-chain polemics, I'm growing a little tired of "This is a chain" posts that don't advance the discussion on much of anything. Let us discuss food.
Sorry. I will discuss both.