plb
Aren't we losing perspective here?
It’s not like he broke into peoples’ houses, stole their beloved and spoiled pets, and then made them fight to the death.
These dogs would not have been bred in the first place if it were not for dog fighting. Which would be better from a dog’s perspective: (1) be born, be given food and shelter, be given medical care, grow up and then sooner or later probably die doing what your instincts tell you to do, or (2) never be born in the first place?
Plb, I gotta go with Option #2--Never been born.
Let's do a thought experient here: It's Roman times and you find yourself being stuck as a gladiator. You get born, live free for a number of years, then get enslaved after losing a battle, and get impressed into being a gladiator, and then killed by that other gladiator who was capable of beating the crap out of you in front of 20,000 people, then stabbing you to death so he could live another day.
Except for that last day, were your first twenty years an ok trade off for being the afternoon's entertainment and dying a horrible, painful death in the Coliseum?
Human beings have responsiblities for the anmials in our care and while people can be and are, at the low end of wrong-doing, jerks, and at the other end, murderers at worst, I can think of no ethical universe where cruelty for entertainment's sake is a moral thing to do.
Bear-baiting used to be entertainment too in medieval tmes, but was it the right thing to do to capture a bear and let dogs kill it for sport? Is that sport? No, it's cruelty and the mindset that accepts cruelty as entertainment has no place in an enlightened society.
Discuss...