quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
Travelin Man..Just a point. I do not think Metro in Seattle serves prime beef. I'm pretty sure about that. I've been there....Perhaps some others on that list of your's may not either?
I can only tell you that it is sometimes hard to hear the rest of an argument when you start out on the wrong foot. The Met most certainly serves prime grade beef. Their menu can be found here:
http://www.themetropolitangrill.com/food.cfm I didn't choose to pull up the web site for every place I mentioned, but here is the Ringside, too:
http://www.ringsidesteakhouse.com/ I guess you have to navigate that one yourself, as it does not link directly to the menu. However, I went back and re-read my post and I never claimed that the Met or anywhere else serves prime beef. I only listed a number of steakhouses so as to lend some kind of credence to my praise of Luger's. I hate when threads offer irrefutable "bests" based on one visit - for instance, "The best philly cheesesteak in the world is at...." when they have only been to two or three places on all of one visit to Philadelphia.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
I feel this is a very important distinction in making a comparison and touting Peter Luger's as the "Best Steakhouse" in America. You are pretty firm on that.
I am? Again, though, re-reading my previous post, I didn't say that Peter Luger is "the "Best Steakhouse" in America." I said that I have been to no place BETTER. However, I also haven't been to Tea Steakhouse in SD or Doe's or any number of other places.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
But, it has to be an "apples to apples" comparison right? That should take into account the cut of meat, the grade and I firmly believe price. Especially the price. Anyone can serve the best quality, if you charge enough for it.
It
HAS to be an "apples to apples" comparison? Ummm...no. I said that I have been to no place BETTER. I never claimed what the criteria for my comparison were - and, other than giving some reference to the places that I am comparing, I don't know that my statement is one that could be disagreed with. If YOU think that
*I* have been to some place better, please let me know. If you would like to only take the cut of meat and the price into account, go for it. For me, intangible things like service, ambiance, history, etc. most certainly play a part in the whole experience that is dining out. A lot of people think that service and ambiance are THE MOST IMPORTANT criteria - as evidenced by the number of frou frou type restaurants that thrive, that aren't really my thing.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
Hey, I'd love to have tried many of the places you are mentioning that "do not compare" to Luger's, but frankly I never had a business expense account. I'm retired and there are choices in life we all make. I never could deal with NYC steakhouse prices on any type of frequent basis. My visits were usually "event driven." I've been to Luger's several times, Bern's, The Old Homestead, Ruth Chris, Metropolitan and a few others.
I am not going to apologize for having a job that keeps me away from my friends and family for about six months out of the year (like you said - we all make choices) and also picks up a portion of my restaurant bills. I am a single guy (which, honestly, has allowed me far more opportunity to travel than my job ever did) with low personal expenses, too. My "expense account" is a per diem that I get when I am on the road for work. It is all of $45/day (and has been for five years). Yes, anyone can easily eat for $45/day at home - but, there is a reason why Rachael Ray did a show called "$40 a Day" - because it is not easy to do when you are eating out on the road. To go to a place like Ringside, the Met or Peter Luger's means that I either need to supplement my per diem or eat significantly cheaper on other meals during my travel period. It is a supplement - but, don't think I am eating high off the hog on the corporate dime.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
I noticed you had very, very few NYC restaurants on your list.
Yes, when I am in NY, and I want a steak, I usually just go to Luger's. I have also been to Major's on Long Island, which is good, but also not in the same class. A lot of the places in NYC are just Luger clones anyway - Wolfgang's, for example - if I am going to do the "Luger-style" - why not go to Luger? Of course, you may not be able to get a table at Luger on short notice - so, that could be a reason to go some place else.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
Perhaps the comparison should be a porterhouse from Luger's to say a porterhouse from someplace like Doe's in Mississippi? I'd think a comparison should also take into account the price.
If a steakhouse in Mississippi cannot provide a quality meal at a lower price than a restaurant in NYC, then there is another problem. I would think that the real estate costs in MS are significantly less than NYC, so if you are big on comparing apples to apples, I don't know that this is going to work, either. Besides, if you are in NY, you are going to have a hard time eating at Doe's - and, besides the people who frequent this site, I don't know too many people who plan their vacations around which steakhouses are available.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
Travlin Man, I don't think you've compared apples to apples so while we can all appreciate that it gets your vote as The Best Steakhouse in the country, I think that may not be correct.
Facts are either correct or incorrect; opinions belong to those that express them - and, by definition, cannot be wrong. The only fact that I stated is that I have never been to any steakhouse better than Luger's.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
Anyone been to Lugers and Doe's? Boy, I'd love to hear from them. Compare the price, not atmosphere, of course. Just the steak.
Just to clarify, I also never said anything about Peter Luger serving the best steak (or one that is better than the steak served anywhere else). As a matter of fact, I never even discussed the steak at all. I mentioned the bacon, the sauce, the tomato and onion appetizer and the famous Luger Burger.
And, as silly as I think Top 10 lists are, I think head-to-head comparisons are just as ridiculous. I know of few people whose decision on where they will eat on any given day would include the choices of Luger's and Doe's on that same day. "What do you think, honey, should we go to Brooklyn or Mississippi tonight for dinner?" No. If you want to compare Pat's and Geno's, go ahead. If you want to compare Katz's and Carnegie, fine. But, Doe's and Luger's just makes no sense to me.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
We've had enough .... "Harold's" posts for a lifetime already.
This is the second time that you mentioned this in a week. For those of us that get out of the house, travel, take pictures, and then write up what we found, it's a little insulting - especially coming from someone who has a few posts and hasn't posted a single trip report. Yes, there are other ways to contribute to this web site, and I don't mean that people who post trips are any more important than anyone else - but, in a variation of the old adage, it seems that those who cannot - just criticize. In my previous post, one of the things that I *DID* write was for someone to offer a steakhouse that *is* better than Luger's. I couldn't find your response anywhere in your otherwise lengthy response.
quote:Originally posted by Baah Ben
Thanks and no disrespect to The Travlin Man.
None taken...I hope you feel the same way.