﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>M &amp; M's Premium</title><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/</link><description /><copyright>(c) Roadfood.com Discussion Board</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (ChefShan)</title><description> I clean a few houses throughout the week and just tried the new Dark choc M and M's.  I really didn't like them but kept eating them anyways.  I prefer regular or peanut m and m's.  Before I knew it half their bowl was gone.  I was laughing to myself.  I would never steal anyones money or peek in their drawers (ok, maybe I peeked once&lt;img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/blushing.gif" alt="" /&gt;) but leave some candy out or some brownies and it's fair game LOL  More than once I've had to say.....&amp;quot;I hope you don't mind but I um, had one of your brownies&amp;quot;  LOL </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430917</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:00:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (Louis)</title><description> I tried the mint flavored ones last week, and the mocha ones today.  Both were pretty good. &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; I think if they want to improve on the product, all they have to do is keep the pretty-colored shell but make it as thick as a  regular M&amp;M--and keep the interesting flavors. &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; As has been said above, an M&amp;M without the crunch just isn't a M&amp;M.  Amen. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430916</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:31:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (outolunch)</title><description> I gave them a try. They are certainly pretty and the mocha wasn't bad at all. But basially I agree with danimal15 -- an m&amp;m without the crunch just isn't an m&amp;m in my book. </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430915</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:48:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (danimal15)</title><description> I don't predict a long lifespan for these. The chocolate taste is rich, but for some reason I like the cheaper chocolate they use in regular M&amp;M's better. And there's no crunch! How can you have an M&amp;M with no crunch? &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; Maybe they'll catch on, who knows. But not with me. </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430914</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:27:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (cavandre)</title><description> Thanks cybele. We have that same problem of &amp;quot;disappearing&amp;quot; M&amp;M's in our house. I blame it on the cats! </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430913</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:56:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (cybele)</title><description> &lt;blockquote id='quote'&gt;&lt;font size='1' face='Arial, Helvetica' id='quote'&gt;quote:&lt;div style='border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #DCDCDC; padding: 4px;'&gt;&lt;i&gt;Originally posted by cavandre&lt;/i&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Anyone tried any of these yet? &lt;br&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote id='quote'&gt;&lt;/font id='quote'&gt; &lt;br&gt; I've tried all of them. Target had the best deal on them at $3.99 (most other stores are $4.50 to $5.00). &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; First thing to note is that they have no crunchy shell.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; They are colorful, they have this metallic painted coating though, but it's not really sweet. Kind of like that waxy coating on Junior Mints ... it takes a moment to get to the flavor.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; I didn't like the fakey raspberry in the Raspberry Almond. There was a chocolate almond as well, but it was really no different that the regular M&amp;Ms Almond (except no candy shell) that it hardly seemed worth the extra money.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; The triple chocolate was interesting, but again, it was hard to discern the different chocolates ... I didn't think they were extraordinary. &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; The mint one was good though, I liked the white chocolate center, it was a like a decadent meltaway (but with no trans fat).  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; THe mocha was also interesting, I love coffee and chocolate and no one else makes something like this. The chocolate is soft and fudgy. It was the one that disappeared first, so I must have liked it.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; Here's some up close photos: &lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/typetive/sets/72157605780007387/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/typetive/sets/72157605780007387/&lt;/a&gt; </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430912</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:29:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: M &amp; M's Premium (Davydd)</title><description> No. In fact I don't think I have seen them if they are new. What I have been buying is M&amp;Ms Peanut with dark chocolate instead of their traditional milk chocolate. That's healthier you know. &lt;img src="http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/upfiles/smiley/wink.gif" alt="" /&gt; </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430911</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:08:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>M &amp; M's Premium (cavandre)</title><description> Anyone tried any of these yet? </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=430910</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:46:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>