﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Wendy's learning from past mistakes with new mid-range burger</title><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/</link><description /><copyright>(c) Roadfood.com Discussion Board</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:Wendy's learning from past mistakes with new mid-range burger (Foodbme)</title><description>  I've gone to the "Value Menu" at any fast food joint all the time if I buy something. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=707494</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:12:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Wendy's learning from past mistakes with new mid-range burger (1bbqboy)</title><description>  the only things I'll buy at chains are $1 burgers. &lt;br&gt;  If I'm going to spend more than that, I prefer to give a real hamburger stand my$$. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=707433</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:49:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Wendy's learning from past mistakes with new mid-range burger (RestaurantBiz)</title><description>  &lt;a href="http://www.industryintel.com/news/read/3400329336/Wendys-New-Son-of-Baconator-Shows-That-Burger-Chain.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;This blogger breaks down&lt;/a&gt; Wendy's second attempt to enter the mid-range burger market with its new "Son of Baconator" burger. Apparently it's "W" burger was a major failure because it was kind of no-man's-land where it didn't appeal to those wanting value or those who wanted a premium burger. Good to see the chain is learning from it's past mistakes. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  I think lots of restaurants can learn from this type information. Often time the success or failure of a new menu item has more to do with how it's positioned from a price point than how it actually tastes. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.roadfood.com/Forums/fb.ashx?m=707431</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:26:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>